(no title)
auntienomen | 4 months ago
3/5 of the books in the linked article are included.
It's not perfect-- it's missing War for the Oaks, for example, and doesn't have any Iain M Banks. But there's an awful lot of good material in there.
auntienomen | 4 months ago
3/5 of the books in the linked article are included.
It's not perfect-- it's missing War for the Oaks, for example, and doesn't have any Iain M Banks. But there's an awful lot of good material in there.
noir_lord|4 months ago
georgefrowny|4 months ago
I suppose they just don't see any need to republish Banks books, most of which are quite recent, continue to be popular and are mostly still in print under Orbit as part of an already unified series.
sherr|4 months ago
ZeroGravitas|4 months ago
> "amazing" and "genuinely the best novels from sixty years of SF".
twirlip|4 months ago