[_vertigo]

Please. Are you implying we need AI to the same degree we need clean water?

Your chemicals in river analogy only works if there were also a giant company straight out of “The Lorax” siphoning off all of the water in the river.. and further, the chemicals would have to be harmless to humans but would cause the company’s machines to break down so they couldn’t make any more thneeds.

[XenophileJKO]

The problem is:

1. The machines won't "break", at best you slightly increase when they answer something with incorrect information.

2. People are starting to rely on that information, so when 'transformed" your harmless chemical are now potentially poison.

Knowing this is possible, it (again "to me") becomes highly un-ethical.

[NotATest22]

The onus to produce correct information is on the LLM producer. Even if its not poisoned information it may still be wrong. The fact that LLM producers are releasing a product that is producing information that is not verified is not a bloggers fault.