[DarkmSparks]

There are no sources, that is the definition of zero evidence.

Also, The fraud was found because the theory was invalidated, not the other way around. It was found that real life did not match the theory (by spending billions on human trials that all failed), so they looked back at the theory and found the results were fake.

There is however evidence that it doesnt. E.g. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/1...

But it was and continues to be ignored.

[AnimalMuppet]

When you say "the only evidence that once existed to say they caused the damage used 100% faked results", that is the kind of claim for which there could be evidence. What's more, it's the kind of claim that you should present evidence for when making the claim, since it's an attack on the credibility and honesty of those doing the study.

[DarkmSparks]

Sure, I am referring there to what started with

https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabricatio...

And finished with the resignation of the stanford prof engaged in it, and all the evidence that they cause cognitive imparment being retracted.

E.g.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04533