[r0x0r007]

"For me, roughly 80% of the code I commit these days is written by the AI agent" Therefore, it is not commited by you, but by you in the name of AI agent and the holy slop. What to say, I hope that 100x productivity is worth it and you are making tons of money. If this stuff becomes mainstream, I suggest open source developers stop doing the grind part, stop writing and maintaining cool libraries and just leave all to the productivity guys, let's see how far they get. Maybe I've seen too many 1000x hacker news..

[visarga]

Just need the feedback to follow suit to be 100x as effective. Tests, docs and rapid loops of guidance with human in the loop. Split your tasks, find the structure that works.

[ChadNauseam]

I think it's fine. For example, "I" made this library https://github.com/anchpop/weblocks . It might be more accurate to say that I directed AI to make it, because I didn't write a line of code myself. (And I looked at the code and it is truly terrible.) But I tested that it works, and it does, and it solves my problem perfectly. Yes, it is slop, but this is a leaf node in the abstraction graph, and no one needs to look at it again now that it it written

[shakna]

Most code, though, is not write once and ignore. So it does matter if its crap, because every piece of software is only as good as its least dependency.

Fine for just you. Not fine for others, not fine for business, not fine the moment you star count starts moving.