(no title)
keithwinstein | 4 months ago
See 15 U.S.C. §§ 260a & 263 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-6/subchap...).
keithwinstein | 4 months ago
See 15 U.S.C. §§ 260a & 263 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-6/subchap...).
dragonwriter|4 months ago
Even more pedantically, “standard time” is not necessarily consistent across each zone (particularly, during the period for which in parts of the zone it is advanced by an hour) since "standard time” only advances for those states, or parts of states, for which an exemption is not in place.
So, the Unix-y convention of using PST for "Pacific Standard Time without advancement", and PDT for "Pacific Standard Time with advancement" is the simplest way of getting meaningful concise labels out of the US legal scheme. (This is only a theoretical issue for some US timezones, but it is a concrete one for at least the Pacific and Hawaii-Aleutian Time Zones.)
keithwinstein|4 months ago
I can't find a source (including 15 U.S.C. § 260a) that supports this reading, although I agree it's a little ambiguous. The law suggests that a region that doesn't observe DST is observing "the standard time otherwise applicable during that period" and is exempt from the provisions regarding advancement, not that "Pacific standard time" depends on where you are (see 15 U.S.C. § 263).
> So, the Unix-y convention [] is the simplest way
No argument there!