Robert W. Malone sounds like an accomplished scientist in Grokipedia and a fraud in Wikipedia. For the ground truth I might start by reading both and asking an LLM for the diff.
Interesting that Grok in Fast mode says that the Wikipedia version is more neutral, but Expert mode says that about the Grokipedia version.
Now that you can cheaply insert a new ideological lens and generate a new version of Wikipedia, I expect to see lots of them. But it seems more sensible to just have the alternative LLMs generate alternative articles on demand rather than materializing the whole thing.
Or, you could start by using tertiary sources correctly and follow the citations and read the sources they depend on, rather than using a hallucination machine to build something even farther from the ground truth from the already-distant sources.
delichon|4 months ago
Interesting that Grok in Fast mode says that the Wikipedia version is more neutral, but Expert mode says that about the Grokipedia version.
Now that you can cheaply insert a new ideological lens and generate a new version of Wikipedia, I expect to see lots of them. But it seems more sensible to just have the alternative LLMs generate alternative articles on demand rather than materializing the whole thing.
dragonwriter|4 months ago
al_borland|4 months ago
The Jimmy Wales Wikipedia page doesn’t have a section for controversies or anything.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales
https://grokipedia.com/page/Jimmy_Wales
jsheard|4 months ago
toomuchtodo|4 months ago