top | item 45734456 (no title) paulvnickerson | 4 months ago Maybe if Wikipedia sourced more peer reviewed publications and less Vox, I would be more satisfied. Thrilled to see Grokipedia as a competitor that could perhaps pressure Wikipedia to improve its editorial policies. discuss order hn newest antoniojtorres|4 months ago I can’t, in good conscience, think that Musk would objectively be a good steward of an encyclopedia. whoknowsidont|4 months ago If this isn't ragebait I don't know what is. unethical_ban|4 months ago Poe's Law in effect. advisedwang|4 months ago Did they omit Wikipedia when creating the models behind Grokipedia? Otherwise it less a competitor and more a re-hash. tapete2|4 months ago Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.
antoniojtorres|4 months ago I can’t, in good conscience, think that Musk would objectively be a good steward of an encyclopedia.
whoknowsidont|4 months ago If this isn't ragebait I don't know what is. unethical_ban|4 months ago Poe's Law in effect.
advisedwang|4 months ago Did they omit Wikipedia when creating the models behind Grokipedia? Otherwise it less a competitor and more a re-hash. tapete2|4 months ago Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.
tapete2|4 months ago Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.
antoniojtorres|4 months ago
whoknowsidont|4 months ago
unethical_ban|4 months ago
advisedwang|4 months ago
tapete2|4 months ago