top | item 45747160

(no title)

jhaile | 4 months ago

The name Superhuman makes a lot more sense for a company with a suite of AI productivity products. The "Grammarly" name was too focused on their original use case of just improving writing.

discuss

order

0cf8612b2e1e|4 months ago

It is a good product name. I can almost imagine an unimaginably rich AI company buying it just for the name.

ljlolel|4 months ago

Grammarly bought Superhuman and it’s already a public company

cardanome|4 months ago

"Superhuman" gives me the creeps as a German.

I know it has a positive connotation with super heroes in US culture but for me it sounds like Übermensch. Especially as it is the direct opposite of "subhuman".

Plus outside of tech bro circles, people either actively hate generative AI or are at least super annoyed by the over-hype of it. Duolingo went all in on AI and got a huge shitstorm.

Branding your company on a current hype that might either burst soon or/and leave lots of people unemployed is maybe not a wise decisions.

JohnFen|4 months ago

> I know it has a positive connotation with super heroes in US culture

I'm not sure about this. I'm a US citizen, but it absolutely does not have positive connotations to me at all. It has very negative ones.

f4uCL9dNSnQm|4 months ago

I had exact same issues with "Uber".

antiloper|4 months ago

"Superhuman" is just "Superman" but without getting sued by DC comics.

balaz|4 months ago

Yes, the idea of the death of God also gives me shivers.

umanwizard|4 months ago

You cannot expect other countries to stop using normal words because they remind you of the bad things your country did.

Shame for what Germany did during the Nazi regime is something for Germans to bear, not Americans. We are not at fault for that, and we have no obligation to change our own culture to accommodate your guilt.

libraryatnight|4 months ago

It seems off-putting and absurd to me. Especially given the result is neither super nor human.