[blackbear_]

Tailoring the message to the audience is really a fundamental principle of good communication.

Scientists and academics demand an entirely different level of rigor compared to customers of LLM providers.

[KeplerBoy]

Sure, but they went slightly overboard with that headline and they knew it. But oh well, they have a lot of eyes and discussion on their paper so it's a success.

[mattlutze]

I feel like, if the feedback to your paper is "this is over-done / they claim more than they prove / it's kinda hype-ish" you're going to get less references in future papers.

That would seem to be counter to the "impact" goal for research.