[dialup_sounds]

FYI, that investigation also resulted in an indictment—conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights.

[potato3732842]

Ah, yes, the 24/Jack Baur "the end justifies the means" defense.

One could even argue that repeated application of that shit over the past 20 (or 120) years is why we're here now having this discussion.

[potato3732842]

Looks like it did a quadruple post, man, that's wild.....

[potato3732842]

Ah, yes, the 24/Jack Baur "the end justifies the means" defense.

Just wait until it's a bad means to an end you don't like.

[potato3732842]

Ah, yes, the 24/Jack Baur "the means justifies the end" defense.

Just wait until it's a bad means to an end you don't like.

[potato3732842]

Ah, yes, the 24/Jack Baur "the means justifies the end" defense.

Just wait until it's an end you don't like.

[dialup_sounds]

I don't know who that is or what that means. I'm referring to the actual indictment filed after the investigation that those phone records were subpoenaed during. It's unclear if you're trying to say that phone records should not be subject to court order or just those of politicians.