top | item 45773195 (no title) veilrap | 4 months ago He’s implying that the variable it’s being defined within the loop. So, constant, but repeatedly redefined. discuss order hn newest ghurtado|4 months ago That's the opposite of what any reasonable engineer means by "constant". fnordsensei|4 months ago That’s the point, you’re just haggling about scopes now. All the way from being new per program invocation to new per loop.Immutability doesn’t have this connotation. load replies (1) davrosthedalek|4 months ago No? It has a lifetime of one loop duration, and is constant during that duration. Seems perfectly fine to me.
ghurtado|4 months ago That's the opposite of what any reasonable engineer means by "constant". fnordsensei|4 months ago That’s the point, you’re just haggling about scopes now. All the way from being new per program invocation to new per loop.Immutability doesn’t have this connotation. load replies (1) davrosthedalek|4 months ago No? It has a lifetime of one loop duration, and is constant during that duration. Seems perfectly fine to me.
fnordsensei|4 months ago That’s the point, you’re just haggling about scopes now. All the way from being new per program invocation to new per loop.Immutability doesn’t have this connotation. load replies (1)
davrosthedalek|4 months ago No? It has a lifetime of one loop duration, and is constant during that duration. Seems perfectly fine to me.
ghurtado|4 months ago
fnordsensei|4 months ago
Immutability doesn’t have this connotation.
davrosthedalek|4 months ago