top | item 45793261

(no title)

spaniard89277 | 3 months ago

I don't understand this article. This a completely solved problem.

Solar is just another component in the grid. Attach solar to the grid if you want, the trains to the grid too.

Like all the countries with electrified railed do.

Electrifying trains with only solar seems a bit stupid IMO, but who am I compared to tech firms betting on electrification.

discuss

order

0_____0|3 months ago

I find it helpful to see this the way that VCs do - these projects aren't a result of asking "is this a good way to accomplish this goal?"

They're a result of looking at an idea and saying "I bet I, personally, can make money off of this."

The degree to which VCs decide the direction of human endeavor is disheartening. We have real problems to solve, and in the case of rail, a really robust set of tools and approaches that are proven to solve them.

dboreham|3 months ago

Like solar cells laid on highways. Thank you. I hadn't seen these bat shit ideas from that perspective. Another great mystery of humanity solved.

kevin_thibedeau|3 months ago

It's all a grift for people who can't do basic math. I'm seeing heavy, low-speed electric passenger rail needs 15-30 kWh per mile. There's no way they can build out enough solar to meet that demand in the RoW for the tracks. Never mind that now you've cluttered the space that workers need to use when performing maintenance and created a safety hazard for emergency access.

PlunderBunny|3 months ago

The article does a very bad job of explaining the 'why' part, but I think they're saying that the benefit is in feeding the solar panel output to the trains without going through the (national) grid. It's presumably cheaper because the grid operator isn't taking a cut. Whether it is significantly cheaper when all the other costs are considered is another question.

Someone|3 months ago

FTA: “A key barrier to electrification is often the limitations of the local electricity grid – it's hard to get access to a big connection for powering your trains. "That problem has only become much, much worse," says Mr Murray.”

⇒ This moves production close to where power is consumed, removing/decreasing the need for new grid infra.

tsimionescu|3 months ago

The article claims this, but the huge amount of electrified rail that already exists, and has for 50 years, suggests the problem isn't as difficult as they make it out.

masklinn|3 months ago

You can't sell a train to VCs, so you have to invent reinvent worse trains.