[panxyh]

[flagged]

[akerl_]

What an intensely rude thing to say to someone who has been providing specialist knowledge in a very deep technical field up and down this page.

[crazygringo]

Nothing about it reads as AI to me. I'm not even the commenter and I take offense when people suggest that knowledgeable, helpful HN comments are AI.

[panxyh]

I see now that it probably wasn't, but "nothing" is an overstatement.

And knowledgeable and helpful responses can be AI, so there might be a fallacy somewhere in your offence-taking. Are you offended when people do that in general, or only when they are wrong?

I do appreciate the effort put into writing a good comment.

[t0mas88]

Nope, AI would probably have written it nicer, I just typed it on my phone :)

[panxyh]

Oh, cheers then :)

But regarding flight ability, wouldn't that be V2? I thought there exist conditions where V1 is well below rotation speed.

Anyways,

> to make sure you can stop before the end of the runway

answers my main question, and makes sense from a procedural standpoint.

But still, hard to believe that there is no room for in-situ evaluation if runway overrun is worse than likely crash. Of course then again, those have to be split second decisions.