This is remarkable if you consider how much it must wound Apple's pride to make this deal with their main rival in the smartphone software space, especially after all the fuss they made about "Apple Intelligence". It's a tacit admission that Google is just better at this kind of thing.
purplecats|3 months ago
do businesses really "think" in a personified manner as this? isnt it just what the accounting resolves to as the optimal path?
lxgr|3 months ago
Andrex|3 months ago
blitzar|3 months ago
Yet at the same time google have the worst offering of all the major players (all starting up out of thin air) in this space.
It doesnt really matter anyway, the LLM is a commodity piece of tech, the interface is what matters and apple should focus on making that rather than worry about scraping the entire internet for training data and spending a trillion on GPUs
lxgr|3 months ago
Is that so? Gemini Models (including Nano Banana), in my experience, are very good, and are kneecapped only by Google’s patronizing guardrails. (They will regularly refuse all kinds of things that GPT and Claude don’t bat a weight at, and I can often talk them out of the refusal eventually, which makes no sense at all.)
That’s not something Apple necessarily has to replicate in their implementation (although if there’s one company I’d trust to go above and beyond on that, it’s Apple).
antipaul|3 months ago
Maybe paying Google a billion a year is still a lot cheaper?
Apple famously tries to focus on only a few things.
Still, they will continue working on their own LLM and plug it in when ready.
Edit: compare to another comment about Wang-units of currency
mgrandl|3 months ago
jb1991|3 months ago
unknown|3 months ago
[deleted]
nsonha|3 months ago
That might be true but Siri sucks so bad it doesn't matter. It uses GPT but the quality is OSS models' level.
NaomiLehman|3 months ago