[delitrem]

> This is 100% LLM generated

Who knows, may be you are right here. I actually thought so at first, but knowing the author personally (he is my former colleague, I had the pleasure of working with him in the same team about 17-18 years ago), his extraordinary abilities and his writing style even before the widespread use of AI, I had my doubts.

[qlm]

There is a 0% chance that the vast majority of this site and the repo that was linked elsewhere was written by a human. I would have zero confidence in anything about this language, and frankly your former colleague should be embarrassed about putting this out.

Edit: I just noticed in another comment: "Perfect for : Trading systems, industrial control, Medical devices, aerospace applications". I'd go further than embarrassed, and say this person should be ashamed of themself and take this down.

[EdwardDiego]

Emojis make it look LLM af.

[PaulRobinson]

Emojis at the end of a statement online are a generational thing, not an AI thing.

Replying to an email inline rather than at the top marks you out as of a certain generation. Using text emojis rather than finding the graphical emoji does too.

Everyone needs to relax about AI generation anyway (did you learn something useful or not? If you did, does it matter if it was AI generated as a site?), but saying "this is what people under 30 frequently do, so it must be fake", is just this weird vibe spreading everywhere I don't get at all.

[allanmacgregor]

I'm sorry but this has all the earmarks of being AI generated, at the very least the website and all the project documentation; and "Trust me I worked with him 2 decades ago, is a very poor argument to inspire confidence"