(no title)
JohnLocke4 | 3 months ago
Stealing a car you were never going to buy and making an exact replica of a car you were never going to buy is two entirely different things.
JohnLocke4 | 3 months ago
Stealing a car you were never going to buy and making an exact replica of a car you were never going to buy is two entirely different things.
davedx|3 months ago
No, it's not. You (or random large media corps) do not get to unilaterally redefine words of the English language like that.
Pass whatever laws you want about it, enforce them however you feel is appropriate, but don't try to redefine language itself to push your agenda.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/theft
kube-system|3 months ago
Furthermore, English is not prescriptive; dictionaries are a lagging reference of observed use... so yes, the users of English absolutely do get to redefine language. That's how all modern English words originated.
And finally, if your dictionary doesn't account for "IP theft", you have simply found an incorrect dictionary, because that usage is undeniably widespread -- whether or not you agree with the concept politically.
JohnLocke4|3 months ago
tmerc|3 months ago
- murder
- kidnapping
- ddosing their site so they can't sell things
- carpet bombing their reviews with 1 star
- filing an injunction blocking the sale of their product on bogus ip claims (aka copyright trolling)
- gaslighting them to the point where they think the idea is worthless
- being the owner of IP that prevents them from selling their IP
Probably others but I think that's enough to show your definition is wrong.
JohnLocke4|3 months ago
I'm not trying to make a definition, just trying to convey my opinion. I suggest we discuss our opinions rather than trying to codify English