top | item 45852821 (no title) fuzzy_biscuit | 3 months ago Of which, perhaps, the author isn't aware? Perhaps the author has very narrow experience in programming languages.Or it's hyperbolic. discuss order hn newest moralestapia|3 months ago >Perhaps the author has very narrow experience in programming languages.I got that impression as well.Xi's impressed about types being optional because they can be inferred.That's ... hardly a novelty ... forgotpwd16|3 months ago >Only the first and third part are compulsory in Zig, which is kind of puzzling, coming from Java or C.Funny they mention Java that has got type inference few years now. Even C got a weaker version of C++'s auto in C23. load replies (1)
moralestapia|3 months ago >Perhaps the author has very narrow experience in programming languages.I got that impression as well.Xi's impressed about types being optional because they can be inferred.That's ... hardly a novelty ... forgotpwd16|3 months ago >Only the first and third part are compulsory in Zig, which is kind of puzzling, coming from Java or C.Funny they mention Java that has got type inference few years now. Even C got a weaker version of C++'s auto in C23. load replies (1)
forgotpwd16|3 months ago >Only the first and third part are compulsory in Zig, which is kind of puzzling, coming from Java or C.Funny they mention Java that has got type inference few years now. Even C got a weaker version of C++'s auto in C23. load replies (1)
moralestapia|3 months ago
I got that impression as well.
Xi's impressed about types being optional because they can be inferred.
That's ... hardly a novelty ...
forgotpwd16|3 months ago
Funny they mention Java that has got type inference few years now. Even C got a weaker version of C++'s auto in C23.