[bubblelicious]

What’s the controversy, unless people are straw manning or pulling from some bad personal experience?

If you are not leveraging the best existing tools for your job (and understanding their limitations) then your output will be lower than it should be and company leadership should care about that.

Claude reduces my delivery time at my job like 50%, not to mention things that get done that would never have been attempted before. LLMs do an excellent job seeding literature reviews and summarizing papers. Would be a pretty bad move for someone in my position to not use AI, and would be pretty unreasonable of leadership not to recognize this.

[CivBase]

Crazy idea: Evaluate me based on my output and not which tools I use. If AI is the killer productivity boost you claim, then I'll have no choice in order to keep up.

[bubblelicious]

I think that’s perfectly fair.

However, if you were leadership in this scenario, and you see people using various AI tools are systematically more productive then the people that aren’t, what would you do?

[hooverd]

at what point do you actually not know anything?

[bubblelicious]

What do you mean?