(no title)
windowshopping | 3 months ago
1. This author's writing is extremely, uncommonly good. Good enough to write a book and have it sell. "Competing with the past of the economy," "residual behaviour of a world that treated labour as sacred," "immigration without immigrants" -- there are many elegant turns of phrase here. This is a very skilled writer.
2. His resume is designed poorly. Have a look. I'm not surprised his job search has been unsuccessful when his resume looks like an essay. OP, you gotta cut that text down by like 70% and put more highlights. This is the world of tiktok and instagram reels.
chis|3 months ago
Totally agree that this guy could write books though.
On some level I always wonder if it'll be better for society if the next generation of bright young minds gets rejected from these tracked paths to big tech or finance and instead are forced to do creative new things. Of course I feel for them too, and losing one's identity at a useful cog in the labor market is a fate that is going to come for all of us soon.
tionate|3 months ago
That said I have no idea how competitive this program is.
solaire_oa|3 months ago
Also consider that the resume has too much text in a pre-LLM world (e.g. this submitter doesn't structure documents for consumption very well, but I'll still read it). Post-LLMs, using an essay-format would make me suspect that the submitter didn't even write it (taking the time to read it is a big gamble).
Not to detract from the article's palpable despair. I genuinely can't say for certain that "well if they made their resume less verbose they'd definitely get hired", because I suspect there's a good chance they still might not. But it probably wouldn't hurt.
lisbbb|3 months ago
alyxya|3 months ago
My overall impression of the resume is that it's fine, but I expect a ton of other candidates to have similar looking resumes. If I were to give advice, either create and demo a really interesting project and show it to someone who would find it interesting (maybe they've done related projects themselves), or find new communities and different groups of people that you share common interests with. It's hard to stand out with just a resume alone, and changing formatting and rewriting words don't change the underlying content.
https://urlahmed.com/assets/documents/am-cv.pdf
devnullbrain|3 months ago
Because both are true, for what they look for. But what's considered standard or desirable differs massively from one market to another - region, industry, role. It even differs at the most granular levels: companies, departments, interviewers. At some point, the difference in what is desired is just differences in culture fit. Applications aren't an exam and you shouldn't expect to 'pass' them all any more than you should expect to 'pass' every date.
If you are a hiring manager, you know what it takes to get hired at one company. That's less than what someone knows if they go out and get two job offers. So, do us a favour, don't muddy the water.
khannn|3 months ago
calepayson|3 months ago
> 2. His resume is designed poorly… This is the world of TikTok and Instagram reels
Imo this is exactly the problem. We’ve constructed a system where brilliance doesn’t shine through. The idea that someone as thoughtful as OP needs to tiktokify their resume to even have a chance at getting hired is ridiculous.
I’m young, so I have no clue, but surely the job market didn’t always work like this?
windowshopping|3 months ago
Many other commenters here disagree, though, so....clearly it's subjective!
gedy|3 months ago
carrychains|3 months ago
brendoelfrendo|3 months ago
I'm of the opinion that a two page resume is fine. Three pages would probably be fine if you needed to elaborate on something really niche like research, but at that point we're getting into CV territory (note that in the US, resume and CV are not the same and a CV is used primarily in academic or scientific settings; a CV is supposed to be exhaustive; a resume is not).
Funny that we're having this conversation here, though, because based on this particular example: the author's resume is fine. It needs punching up, and he should probably turn some of those paragraphs into bulleted lists, but I don't think it's too long.
socalgal2|3 months ago
Den_VR|3 months ago
carlosjobim|3 months ago
No it didn't. Established (older) people saw it as their duty to help the younger generation become a part of the team. Today's older generation have nothing but hate and resentment against the young, and nobody considers themselves as having even the slightest duty towards younger generations. Maybe for their own family members, but usually not even that.
augment_me|3 months ago
AznHisoka|3 months ago
soupfordummies|3 months ago
ivape|3 months ago
unknown|3 months ago
[deleted]
szundi|3 months ago
[deleted]
bern4444|3 months ago
In the US we often use the term interchangeably but internationally they are quite different.
windowshopping|3 months ago
soerxpso|3 months ago
I see people say this literally every time someone complaining about lack of interviews posts their resume. We shouldn't have a system where every job seeker is supposed to be more of a resume formatting expert than the average HR rep. The fact that someone looking to hire is going to see an okay resume of a highly qualified candidate and say, "LOL too long; didn't read" is the most glaring symptom of what he's talking about.
llbbdd|3 months ago
x0x0|3 months ago
As it is, open job reqs get hammered. A hiring manager needs to rapidly discard 95% or more of resumes to get down to a manageable number to directly review. The last time I had an open job req I closed it at 500 applications that came in between Thursday afternoon when I opened it and Tuesday morning when I closed it.
pizlonator|3 months ago
Yeah.
OP - shorten it! Make it easy for hiring managers to quickly glimpse what are your key skills. Is it Python? PyTorch? Tensorflow? C++? When I'm flipping through resumes to decide who to screen, I'm looking for keywords. You're not giving me keywords so I'm going to be annoyed by your resume, and that might give you a weaker shot than you'd otherwise have.
alyxya|3 months ago
ttoinou|3 months ago
boznz|3 months ago
zamalek|3 months ago
atonse|3 months ago
I don’t know enough about the job market apart from anecdotes.
But I also know there are a lot of shortages in the trades.
So SOME job markets are slow for sure. But others are still desperate.
darkwater|3 months ago
I disagree. He just needs some nicer-looking template and that would be a perfectly valid CV [1]. Perhaps reducing a bit some paragraph, but not by 70% at all (nor 50 or 40).
[1] https://urlahmed.com/assets/documents/am-cv.pdf
sehansen|3 months ago
But even with the current resume I'd still call this guy in for an interview if I were hiring for an ML position.
mvdtnz|3 months ago
I mean he might fill some Gladwellian niche of being confidently wrong on topics he has only a basic understanding of I guess.
It might pay for him to listen for a bit.
spookie|3 months ago
unknown|3 months ago
[deleted]
watwut|3 months ago
My point is, this nitpicking about whether CV is too long or tiktok like is just result of a bed economy and companies having 20 applicants for one position. And if this guy perfectly hits random set of signals to get hired, it is just that someone else will be unemployed.
When you have 30 grands on 3 positions, the overall employment situation wont be solved by them writing better CV. That is just the game of musical chairs we are playing to get jobs.
terminalshort|3 months ago
burnt-resistor|3 months ago
Moreover In terms of compulsory education like K-12, it should also include public service and life-work skills like customer service modeling behavior, personal financial management, civics, and media critical thinking skills because Common Core and NCLBA succeeded only at creating greater mass ignorance.
DiscourseFan|3 months ago
never_inline|3 months ago
devnullbrain|3 months ago
barrenko|3 months ago
If the uses these 7 months to focus on his writing on the other hand... We'll need people with a soul and technical chops to cover this apocalypse (using it in the original sense of the word).
dbspin|3 months ago
nhaehnle|3 months ago
martindbp|3 months ago
kelipso|3 months ago
sevenseacat|3 months ago
ghostpepper|3 months ago
aryonoco|3 months ago
I can’t claim to write as well, but weirdos like us do exist.
lisbbb|3 months ago
ghaff|3 months ago
PeterStuer|3 months ago
adammarples|3 months ago
fxtentacle|3 months ago
unknown|3 months ago
[deleted]
anonymous_343|3 months ago
hansvm|3 months ago
The only readily available link I saw was to his CV, and it was shorter than a lot of resumes. It's wordier per line item than a normal CV, but it's not bad. Assuming it passes a sanity check for AI slop and role fit, as a hiring manager I wouldn't personally mind the length.
Are other people throwing that sort of thing into the circular filing bin?
dubeye|3 months ago
anovikov|3 months ago
He could be the next Cory Doctorow. He actually writes better.
ludicrousdispla|3 months ago
cush|3 months ago
poopiokaka|3 months ago
[deleted]