top | item 45872249

(no title)

notimetorelax | 3 months ago

It’s fairly trivial to write a law that makes those illegal.

discuss

order

o11c|3 months ago

"No liability" already mostly only applies to defective products, not harmful ones.

The only industry with a broad "no liability for torts" is gun manufacturing.

eru|3 months ago

The question is whether you want to interfere in the freedom of contract for this.

Almost all software everywhere comes with a 'no liability' clause. And arguable, open source couldn't exist without it.

The exceptions where liability is wanted negotiate that specifically.

otterley|3 months ago

There is precedent, for example, lemon laws related to automobiles. Unfortunately, governments have ceased to care for consumers like they once did.

SkiFire13|3 months ago

> And arguable, open source couldn't exist without it.

Couldn't you just include selling a product or a licence for it as a requirement?