[tuveson]

If Google cured cancer tomorrow, there's someone that would be complaining about it and adding "cancer" to the "killed by Google" list. I would be very surprised if smaller browser vendors were happy about having to maintain ancient XSLT code, and I doubt new vendors were planning on ever adding support. Good riddance.

[hrimfaxi]

Smaller browser vendors already pick and choose the features they support. Which companies do you have in mind that are cheering for this initiative?

[tuveson]

The post specifically calls out Apple and Mozilla as wanting to get rid of XSLT support, but just insinuates that this is because Google is paying them off. Obviously I think Google's monopoly position and backroom dealings are bad, but I also think that's completely unrelated, and that the more likely explanation for the other mainstream vendors wanting to get rid of XSLT is that it's a feature virtually no one uses and is likely a maintenance burden for the other non-Chromium browsers.

> Smaller browser vendors already pick and choose the features they support.

If there weren't a gazillion features to support, maybe there would be more browsers. I think criticizing Google and other vendors for _adding_ tons of bloat would be a better use of time.

[mouse_]

> smaller browser vendors

Such as???

[RGBCube]

Mozilla.