"Those (the Penn family) who would give up essential Liberty (money & power), to purchase a little temporary Safety (a veto over a taxation dispute, trying to raise money from the Penn family), deserve neither Liberty (said money & power) nor Safety (the defense that said taxed money would've bought from the present French & Indian wars)"
> Those (the Penn family) who would give up essential Liberty
No, you've got it half-backwards.
He's saying the democratic legislature shouldn't forever give up the citizens' collective Liberty to tax the ultra-mega-rich (Penns) in exchange for a one-time Security payment from those rich near-nobles.
GuinansEyebrows|3 months ago
pseudalopex|3 months ago
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#Slavery
CamperBob2|3 months ago
It might not even take that long, at the rate we're progressing.
estearum|3 months ago
There is no such thing as avoiding this trade off entirely.
dwattttt|3 months ago
zahlman|3 months ago
Terr_|3 months ago
No, you've got it half-backwards.
He's saying the democratic legislature shouldn't forever give up the citizens' collective Liberty to tax the ultra-mega-rich (Penns) in exchange for a one-time Security payment from those rich near-nobles.
https://www.npr.org/2015/03/02/390245038/ben-franklins-famou...
unknown|3 months ago
[deleted]