[chiph]

> Design For Rapid Scale In a Crisis

One of the things that I think Anduril (Palmer Luckey and other founders) is doing right is designing for manufacturability. The invasion of Ukraine has shown that future conflicts will use up weapons at a very high pace. And that the US capability to build them at the rate needed to sustain conflict isn't there anymore. But that one thing that could help is making them easier to build. (the decline of US manufacturing is a related but separate topic)

[trhway]

>The invasion of Ukraine has shown that future conflicts will use up weapons at a very high pace.

That has been shown even in WWII. And the war was won by US/UK/USSR specifically because their mass production of weapons were several times higher than Germany/Japan/Italy.

The war in Ukraine actually haven't yet reached the levels of weapons use of WWII. (for example 500K-1M/day artillery shells in WWII vs. 20-60K/day in Ukraine war)

These days i so far see only China capable and ready to produce weapons, say drones, at that scale. And i so far don't see anybody, including Anduril with their anti-drone systems, able, or even preparing, to deal with 1M/day (my modest estimate of what China would unleash even in a small conflict like say for Taiwan) of enemy drones. No existing anti-drone systems/approaches are scalable to that level, and we can only hope that something new is being developed somewhere in top secret conditions, and that is why we don't know about it.

[Y-bar]

What’s up with Maga people using LotR names for their military/panopticon companies?

Anduril, Palantir, Lembas have I seen so far.

[kchoudhu]

It's the only book they've read, most likely.

[qchris]

Here's a 2022 from Quartz article that might have some context on this. Anduril isn't on the list according to the footnote, but Thiel and Lucky have since had a history collaborating on projects with the same naming scheme.

[1] https://qz.com/1346926/the-hidden-logic-of-peter-thiels-lord...

[2] https://fortune.com/2025/07/07/peter-thiel-palmer-luckey-ere...

[dgunay]

Is it a MAGA thing, or is it just a Palmer Luckey thing?

[mmooss]

It's especially interesting because their philosophy is the opposite of Tolkien's. They seek power at all costs, trying to create 'rings' and dallying with bad people.

One common rhetorical tactic, commonly used by their political allies, is to use their (perceived) enemies' most powerful words and ideas against them, to disarm and counter-attack. 'Woke' was a term on the left; racism became descrimination against white people, diversity becomes affirmative action for conservatives, banning and mocking and even embracing discussions of Nazis, etc.

[JoshTriplett]

Lembas seems unrelated to the MIC, or is there some investor or board member in common?

(EDIT: thanks to a reply for researching; it is the same people.)

As for the rest, I think because it's many of the same people and the same VCs.

[mellosouls]

Nerd culture. Def not maga, more silicon valley and tech startup types.

[bootsmann]

Is this just their marketing language or have they independently verified this? IIRC their interceptors got absolutely rinsed at trials in Alaska so I’d be very wary of their claims at this point.

[ntonozzi]

Could you share more information about the trials in Alaska? I can't track down the results you're talking about.

[nradov]

In particular Anduril is designing its weapons such that they could be manufactured in many other existing civilian factories using common tools and equipment. This should allow for rapidly scaling production in a crisis.

[DeathArrow]

>The invasion of Ukraine has shown that future conflicts will use up weapons at a very high pace. And that the US capability to build them at the rate needed to sustain conflict isn't there anymore.

China has no issue with manufacturing so they will be happy to sell weapons to US at better prices than US manufactured weapons. :)

[mcphage]

> the decline of US manufacturing is a related but separate topic

I was under the impression that US manufacturing output is at an all-time high—is that not the case?

[w10-1]

> that one thing that could help is making them easier to build

That means anyone can build them.

Be wary of advances that benefit your enemy as much as you, and make more of your enemies capable of war.

[gyulai]

> sustain conflict

...this turn of phrase in relation to goal-setting really makes you think twice.

[ACCount37]

Welcome to war. If you can't sustain a conflict, you will lose to anyone who can.