[atraac]

Those things have nothing to do with C# though, rather than your personal experience with companies that were using it.

If I judged every single company i worked at/interacted with, that uses NodeJs, I'd think that every single Node dev is a 13 year old child with no real experience but who think's he's the hottest shit. That has nothing to do with Node and doesn't really describe _all_ the companies out there.

[UK-Al05]

The problem is thats how a lot of .net shop operate. I say this as .net developer.

.NET gets selected because a lot of non tech companies need to do software things, and they pick the stack fits in with their current WinTel stack. The main concerns is having replaceable talent to reliably do x. They're not trying to innovate. They are often doing something like sending out insurance quotes by email. They do this by having strict processes, and having developers stay in their lane. Expect rigid scrum, using dependencies only supported by Microsoft etc, Locked down Dev machines with visual studio only, ask for microsoft dev certs, and expect pre-approved enterprise design patterns up the wazoo. They don't want innovative developers, they want you to fit into the pre existing framework designed by an architect. Your skills can die in such an environment.

There are companies that use .NET that aren't like this, but you have to go out your way to find them.

[mexicocitinluez]

Imo, you're criticizing "enterprise" development, not .NET/C#.

[Lumping6371]

What's skills? Pumping out code ala startup? Sounds like a stable environment. Someone with a good eye will still be able to pick out flaws in the processes/architecture and learn a thing or two.

"The main concern is having replaceable talent to reliably do X" as in every other company?

I swear you guys make having a regular job sound like being under slavery. It's just a job. Some companies are boring, that's just part of the job, and being able to adapt to different environments is what makes a good sde imo.

[array_key_first]

I agree, I'm just speaking to the culture and I DO think Microsoft has something to do with it.

Companies who choose Microsoft everything don't think much. They're not risk takers, and I don't even mean substantial risks. They're stubborn, old-school. But not in a charming way, in a 'grampa won't stop talking about how great it was before integration' way.