top | item 45915243 (no title) sim04ful | 3 months ago It's actually funny, the lack of styling actually makes consuming the info alot easier. discuss order hn newest hbosch|3 months ago The page is objectively and substantially better in every aspect of legibility with CSS loaded. catapart|3 months ago Hey, take it easy! It's not nice to pick on those poor developers who can only read text that has been piped into their preferred TUI. NewsaHackO|3 months ago Yea, "Minimalism is better!" is like a reflex for some people load replies (1) spiderice|3 months ago > objectivelyI do not think that word means what you think it means load replies (2) yuters|3 months ago It is way more readable with CSS, I don't know what you're all on about.The font is bigger, the lines are shorter, the navigation doesn't take half the page. The only thing worse would be the contrast but it's not that bad. a2128|3 months ago On mobile it's actually super readable and lines are a perfect length, and having to scroll past the top navigation doesn't affect readability much load replies (1) badosu|3 months ago Funny if not tragic. I was impressed at how good the styling of the page was until I realized the css did not load. amelius|3 months ago Except I like to have some margin. And since I have a wide screen, the number of words per line is too large. prmoustache|3 months ago That is a weird take. Having a wide screen doesn't force you to maximize the window. load replies (1)
hbosch|3 months ago The page is objectively and substantially better in every aspect of legibility with CSS loaded. catapart|3 months ago Hey, take it easy! It's not nice to pick on those poor developers who can only read text that has been piped into their preferred TUI. NewsaHackO|3 months ago Yea, "Minimalism is better!" is like a reflex for some people load replies (1) spiderice|3 months ago > objectivelyI do not think that word means what you think it means load replies (2)
catapart|3 months ago Hey, take it easy! It's not nice to pick on those poor developers who can only read text that has been piped into their preferred TUI.
NewsaHackO|3 months ago Yea, "Minimalism is better!" is like a reflex for some people load replies (1)
spiderice|3 months ago > objectivelyI do not think that word means what you think it means load replies (2)
yuters|3 months ago It is way more readable with CSS, I don't know what you're all on about.The font is bigger, the lines are shorter, the navigation doesn't take half the page. The only thing worse would be the contrast but it's not that bad. a2128|3 months ago On mobile it's actually super readable and lines are a perfect length, and having to scroll past the top navigation doesn't affect readability much load replies (1)
a2128|3 months ago On mobile it's actually super readable and lines are a perfect length, and having to scroll past the top navigation doesn't affect readability much load replies (1)
badosu|3 months ago Funny if not tragic. I was impressed at how good the styling of the page was until I realized the css did not load.
amelius|3 months ago Except I like to have some margin. And since I have a wide screen, the number of words per line is too large. prmoustache|3 months ago That is a weird take. Having a wide screen doesn't force you to maximize the window. load replies (1)
prmoustache|3 months ago That is a weird take. Having a wide screen doesn't force you to maximize the window. load replies (1)
hbosch|3 months ago
catapart|3 months ago
NewsaHackO|3 months ago
spiderice|3 months ago
I do not think that word means what you think it means
yuters|3 months ago
The font is bigger, the lines are shorter, the navigation doesn't take half the page. The only thing worse would be the contrast but it's not that bad.
a2128|3 months ago
badosu|3 months ago
amelius|3 months ago
prmoustache|3 months ago