top | item 45921571 (no title) nrclark | 3 months ago Would you feel the same way if we're talking about your car's driver-assistance ECU? If you can change its contents, then so can a remote attacker. discuss order hn newest josephcsible|3 months ago "remote"? No. I want my driver-assistance ECU to be air-gapped but fully reprogrammable locally. After all, even with a totally tivoized ECU, a physically present attacker could still make my car kill me by cutting my brake lines. samrus|3 months ago > Open source === RCEs/vulnerabilitiesWelcome back 2005 bill gates oneshtein|3 months ago When it open source, it can be patched to fix RCE. Binary blobs are much harder to patch, so just buy a brand new car with brand new RCE. unknown|3 months ago [deleted]
josephcsible|3 months ago "remote"? No. I want my driver-assistance ECU to be air-gapped but fully reprogrammable locally. After all, even with a totally tivoized ECU, a physically present attacker could still make my car kill me by cutting my brake lines.
oneshtein|3 months ago When it open source, it can be patched to fix RCE. Binary blobs are much harder to patch, so just buy a brand new car with brand new RCE.
josephcsible|3 months ago
samrus|3 months ago
Welcome back 2005 bill gates
oneshtein|3 months ago
unknown|3 months ago
[deleted]