[davidclark]

On the other hand, when people who claim success with AI share their prompts, I see all the same misses and flaws that keep me from fully buying in. For the person though, it seems like they gloss over these errors and claim wild success. Their prompts never actually seem that different from the ones that fail me as well.

It seems like “you’re not doing it correctly” is just a rationalization to protect the pro-AI person’s established opinion.

[_boffin_]

Nobody does it correctly—ai or not.

It’s about breaking the problem down into epics, tasks, and acceptance criteria that is reviewed. Review the written code and adjust as needed.

Tests… a lot of tests.