top | item 45936127

(no title)

adam1996TL | 3 months ago

[dead]

discuss

order

malfist|3 months ago

Your comment has a whole lot of "it's not just X, it's Y" for a human authored comment.

podgorniy|3 months ago

I could not have said it better. We're on the same page with you.

I would add that to my opinion if previously code production/management was a limiting factor in software development, today it's not. The conceptualisation (onthology, methodology) of the framework (spec-centric devlopment) for the system production and maintenance (code, artifacts, running system) becomes a new limiting factor. But it's matter of time we'll figure out 2-3 methodologies (like it happened with the agile's scrum/kanban) which will become a new "baseline". We're at the early stages when new "laws of llm development" (as in "laws of physics") is still being figured out.

skydhash|3 months ago

I know enough about Machine Learning and statistics to understand that errors are always there. It just needs to be small enough to not matter in the decisions that need to be taken (hopefully). But the thing is that computers can't differentiate errors from correct behavior. Anything in the code is true and if the result is catastrophic, so be it.

As software engineers, it's very often easy to specify what the system should do. But ensuring that it doesn't do what he shouldn't do is the tiresome part of the job. And most tools we created is to ensure the latter.