top | item 45962454

(no title)

shmaplex | 3 months ago

Yeah, these are all valid concerns. Thanks for the feedback.

1. Revenue should not be a fixed number. Consider adjustable indexing as a solution as you mentioned. 2. The revenue in USD was for modelling only. Anyone can change this based on their locale and pick their own currency as their laws permit. 3. Good point and these need to be considered, maybe there is a clause or something that can be added to cover this. Will look into it. 4. You as the repo or project owner make those decisions. That’s not for the license to decide I believe. “This also adds management and accounting overhead to the open source project, which isn't great.” there are plenty of software that handles this. Probably even some open source ones that could solve these hurdles.

discuss

order

shmaplex|3 months ago

I've converted license to plain text instead of markdown and have added: anti-evasion clause, affiliate aggregation rules, audit rights, gross attributable revenue, closed some loopholes, democratic governance process (with public comment), procurement alignment language and incentive-fit structures. Would be great to get anymore feedback.