[sippeangelo]

> Neither engenders user trust in the work that the agent undertook. Antigravity provides context on agentic work at a more natural task-level abstraction, with the necessary and sufficient set of artifacts and verification results, for the user to gain that trust.

I'm going to need an AI summary of this page to even start comprehending this... It doesn't help that the scrolling makes me nauseous, just like real anti-gravity probably would.

[roncesvalles]

Then there's this:

"A more intuitive task-based approach to monitoring agent activity, presenting you with essential artifacts and verification results to build trust."

The whole thing around "trust" is really weird. Why would I as a user care about that? It's not as if LLMs are perfect oracles and the only thing between us and a brave new world is blind trust in whatever the LLM outputs.

[TheRoque]

I'd say that because right now, verifying the LLM output (meaning: not trusting it) is a huge bottleneck (rightfully so). I guess they are trying to convince people that this bottleneck is no more, with this IDE.

[dannyfritz07]

wow, you weren't kidding about the scroll induced nausea.

[thisisit]

Written by AI now summarise and explained by AI.

[titanomachy]

Translation: "don't trouble your little brain actually trying to read the code that our model produced. we can show you pictures of the output instead."