(no title)
charliebwrites | 3 months ago
Google may have won the browser wars with Chrome, but Microsoft seems to be winning the IDE wars with VSCode
charliebwrites | 3 months ago
Google may have won the browser wars with Chrome, but Microsoft seems to be winning the IDE wars with VSCode
thanhhaimai|3 months ago
dragonwriter|3 months ago
lokimedes|3 months ago
vovavili|3 months ago
btown|3 months ago
Firstly, the barrier to entry lower for people to take web experience and create extensions, furthering the ecosystem moat for Electron-based IDEs.
Even more importantly, though, the more we move towards "I'm supervising a fleet of 50+ concurrent AI agents developing code on separate branches" the more the notion of the IDE starts to look like something you want to be able to launch in an unconfigured cloud-based environment, where I can send a link to my PM who can open exactly what I'm seeing in a web browser to unblock that PR on the unanswered spec question.
Sure, there's a world where everyone in every company uses Zed or similar, all the way up to the C-suite.
But it's far more likely that web technologies become the things that break down bottlenecks to AI-speed innovation, and if that's the case, IDEs built with an eye towards being portable to web environments (including their entire extension ecosystems) become unbeatable.
whynotminot|3 months ago
It’s part of the furniture at this point, for better or worse. Maybe don’t bet on it, but certainly wouldn’t be smart to bet against it, either.
Miraste|3 months ago
SR2Z|3 months ago
jshen|3 months ago
Aurornis|3 months ago
I used Visual Studio Code across a number of machines including my extremely underpowered low-spec test laptop. Honestly it’s fine everywhere.
Day to day, I use an Apple Silicon laptop. These are all more than fast enough for a smooth experience in Visual Studio Code.
At this point the only people who think Electron is a problem for Visual Studio Code either don’t actually use it (and therefore don’t know what they’re talking about) or they’re obsessing over things like checking the memory usage of apps and being upset that it could be lower in their imaginary perfect world.
verdverm|3 months ago
Alternatives have a lot of features to implement to reach parity
pjc50|3 months ago
no_wizard|3 months ago
I think the ship sailed
alexfromapex|3 months ago
TZubiri|3 months ago
In order to build a web app, you will first need a web app
mrweasel|3 months ago
wnevets|3 months ago
_harsch|3 months ago
cyberax|3 months ago
Meanwhile, JetBrains IDEs are still the best, but remain unpopular outside of Android Studio.
throwaway2037|3 months ago
philipwhiuk|3 months ago
PyCharm’s lack of popularity surprises me. Maybe it’s not good enough at venvs
WD-42|3 months ago
harrall|3 months ago
Hence even the infamous Ballmer quote.
AstroBen|3 months ago
aDyslecticCrow|3 months ago
catlover76|3 months ago
They have a chance to compete fresh with Fleet, but they are not making progress on even the basic IDE there, let alone getting anywhere near Cursor when it comes to LLM integration.
pstuart|3 months ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vhh_GeBPOhs
stefan_|3 months ago
WD-42|3 months ago
recursive|3 months ago
alansammarone|3 months ago
neovim won the IDE wars before it even started. Zed has potential. I don't know what IntelliJ is.
dabockster|3 months ago
It started as a modernized Eclipse competitor (the Java IDE) but they've built a bunch of other IDEs based on it. Idk if it still runs on Java or not, but it had potential last I used it about a decade ago. But running GUI apps on the JVM isn't the best for 1000 reasons, so I hope they've moved off it.
smikhanov|3 months ago
“I never read The Economist” – Management Trainee, aged 42.
Sharlin|3 months ago