Regulations are like lines of code in a software project. They're good if well written, bad if not, and what matters more is how well they fit into the entire solution
A major difference with regulations is there’s no guaranteed executor of those metaphorical lines of code. If the law gets enforced, then yes, but if nobody enforces it, it loses meaning.
Not only in the executive/enforcement, but in the actual impact of the regulation in practice as applied by millions in a distributed system. Regulations influence decision paths as opposed to encoding deterministic code paths.
The problem with laws that both the enforcer and the subject (enforcee?) agree are bad, is that enforcement is variable. And that leads to corruption. Every damn time.
You could also optimize everything for future updates that optimize things even further for even more updates...
Humm.. that was supposed to be a joke but our law making dev team isn't all that productive to put it mildly. Perhaps some of that bloat would be a good thing until we are brave enough to do the full rewrite.
gessha|3 months ago
int_19h|3 months ago
estimator7292|3 months ago
(joke)
pbh101|3 months ago
Kostchei|3 months ago
erikerikson|3 months ago
lucketone|3 months ago
aallaall|3 months ago
samdoesnothing|3 months ago
econ|3 months ago
Humm.. that was supposed to be a joke but our law making dev team isn't all that productive to put it mildly. Perhaps some of that bloat would be a good thing until we are brave enough to do the full rewrite.
banana_sandwich|3 months ago
i’d rather something a bit more verbose and clear than cryptic and confusing. there are many actors in the world with different brains.
AceJohnny2|3 months ago
The world's complicated. "Every complex problem has a solution which is simple, direct, and wrong"
Simplicity is a laudable goal, but it's not always the one thing to optimize for.