(no title)
GoatOfAplomb | 3 months ago
But I don't think I'm willing to give up fully automated data refreshes at this point. I have too many accounts to track.
GoatOfAplomb | 3 months ago
But I don't think I'm willing to give up fully automated data refreshes at this point. I have too many accounts to track.
throw0101c|3 months ago
YNAB4 was a local client, but with YNAB5 they sadly (to me) went online and subscription.
I happily paid for v4 (one-time purchase), but was/am not willing to pay for v5 because (a) I don't like renting software, and (b) I have no need for syncing (which a subscription could justify to pay for ongoing server costs).
DarmokJalad1701|3 months ago
adastra22|3 months ago
https://financier.io/
ornornor|3 months ago
It uses a plugin structure so if your bank is missing you can contribute your parser.
https://rubygems.org/gems/ynab_convert/versions/2.0.6
polalavik|3 months ago
a-fadil|3 months ago
amrawad|3 months ago
Happy to help build an integration with [Lunch Flow](https://lunchflow.app), which aggregates multiple open banking providers for global coverage behind a single API.
GoatOfAplomb|3 months ago
conradev|3 months ago
Language models are great at turning those statements into Beancount postings and fixing errors, but the local ones not so much yet.
bob_theslob646|3 months ago
Why would someone need this? How do you use this?
whyleyc|3 months ago
grvdrm|3 months ago
https://copilot.money/
doctorhandshake|3 months ago
GoatOfAplomb|3 months ago
abustamam|3 months ago
The I found Tiller[0]. I've been really happy with it so far.
It basically syncs your transactions to a Google sheet you own. It comes with some basic things like budget and auto categorization based on fuzzy string matching, but because it's Google sheets you can play with it and do whatever you want with it.
But the nice thing is that you can dictate which accounts go into which sheet. So I have two sheets — one for household accounts and one for personal. And I don't need a separate subscription, which would have been required if I used any other service I had looked at. I can't remember exactly how much the subscription was, but I don't remember it being unfair.
[0] https://tiller.com/
Klonoar|3 months ago
By nature of the economic system, you must interact with 3rd parties, unless you somehow live a life where you can manage to be all crypto or (increasingly harder) cash based. At that point, there is no real benefit to privacy outside of ensuring that whatever institution(s) you work with aren't doing anything odd.
I'm open to missing something here.
danielheath|3 months ago
My bank has both commercial & cultural reasons not to sell my ID & transaction history. They might still do it anyways, but it's at least plausible that they wouldn't, if only due to the harm to their reputation if it ends up in the papers.
cortesoft|3 months ago
I used Mint for years, and I LOVED it. Hooked it up to all my accounts, it could track purchases and spending and kept everything up to date automatically. It would remember how I categorized things.
Of course, then Intuit decided to get rid of it and force everyone to move to Credit Karma, which doesn't do the same things AT ALL. I don't care about tracking my credit scores, and I pay off all my credit cards every month, I don't need help finding a loan for anything. The only thing it does is try to offer me loans and credit cards. It doesn't have any transaction history, so it doesn't do the one thing I care about.
The decade+ of transaction history I had in Mint was just GONE. It really sucked, and I have not found a replacement yet.
I don't mind if it is hosted, or even if I have to pay for it, but I would like to be able to keep my historical data, and for it to automatically populate from my accounts, and not go away if a company decides it can't make money from it anymore.
a-fadil|3 months ago
1– Install a piece of software and run it locally, no subscription, no cloud 2– Have to right to use a nicer app instead of a spreadsheet 3– not hand over your banking creds. Some banks will void your account insurance if you do 4– Reduce your exposure by not putting all your financial data on some startup’s servers.
duskdozer|3 months ago
It might not protect any more data, but not attempting is a guarantee that it won't.
purple_turtle|3 months ago
I prefer to not give to even more people.
TacticalCoder|3 months ago
[deleted]
ekhaliul|3 months ago
GoatOfAplomb|3 months ago
unknown|3 months ago
[deleted]
aaliyamarrey|3 months ago
[deleted]
embedding-shape|3 months ago
I'd love that too, but I'm not sure it's even feasible or possible, at least in the EU country where I live. I, like most people (I think?) need to file taxes each year, and those include my new positions, or what positions have disappeared, including how much I have in savings. And, the only way for me to keep savings without losing money, is to keep it in a bank, so it's again not private.
Feels like "private finance" been dead for a long time, unless you start using cryptocurrencies specifically for privacy, like zcash, otherwise you'll be having non-private data at least somewhere.
ldoughty|3 months ago
And I think that's what the parent post is talking about. Today's companies make you agree to 3 50-page documents which they can update at any time and your continued use after such silent updates constitutes consent.. and at some point they will sell your financial status/well-being to people for profit. So the more you feed them the more of your data that is being easily sold.
We ultimately probably can't stop that, but we can make it more difficult. Many apps like this would take your information and sell it.. having an option that lets you track your own finances without becoming a product is nice.
purple_turtle|3 months ago
I prefer to not give to even more people.
In the same way as my doctor knowns some private health info but to keep it private I would prefer to not give it to my employer.