[poplarsol]

Must suck to be subjected to extraterritorial jurisdiction from a body you have never acknowledged the authority of.

[arlort]

The ICC in this case is investigating crimes committed in a party to the Rome treaty, that's not extraterritorial jurisdiction

Even ignoring that one of these cases involves death and destruction and the other doesn't

[anonymousiam]

Your comment can be interpreted in two ways:

1) It must suck for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant to be subject to a rogue French judge.

2) It must suck for the judge to face consequences from the US.

[shkkmo]

> 1) It must suck for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant to be subject to a rogue French judge.

How is the french judge "rogue"?

How is a ICC warrant "extra territorial"? It only calls for the arrest of the individual inside ICC member countries.

[10000truths]

I think the ambiguity was deliberate.

[einpoklum]

Actually, Israel _was_ a party to the Rome Statute, and thus the ICC. It withdrew its signature in 2002, during the post-Oslo-process intensification of military action against the Palestinians. So, your analogy is flawed.

[wang_li]

Yeah. GDPR is annoying as fuck.