[mmcclure]

    My original point in this subthread was that SFUSD is NOT underfunded. Do you believe it IS underfunded?

Your original point was not that it's "not underfunded," it was that it's overfunded (and substantially so, based on other comments). Your top(ish) comment on this thread to the $28k per student average:

    I'm saying it's a lot.

My only argument here is that I don't think $28k is unreasonable, particularly when viewed against the cost of private alternatives.

    then that would rule out almost all SFUSD schools, which kind of defeats the point of the discussion!

We go to our attendance area SFUSD school and love it. There are plenty of SFUSD and private schools that would not be on our list, be it for academic reasons or logistical.

    I made a tool to do that

Cool, I dig it! Annoying, unsolicited feature request would be to allow addresses or zip codes rather than requiring geolocation :)

[rahimnathwani]

  Your original point was not that it's "not underfunded," it was that it's overfunded

Here's my original comment. I didn't say it was overfunded: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46007623

(But I do think it's overfunded.)

  My only argument here is that I don't think $28k is unreasonable, particularly when viewed against the cost of private alternatives.

OK, so we agree SFUSD is not underfunded?

  We go to our attendance area SFUSD school and love it.

That's great! At my attendance area school, two thirds of students are behind grade level in math, and there's no opportunity to be grouped with kids in other grades.

  Annoying, unsolicited feature request would be to allow addresses or zip codes rather than requiring geolocation :)

If this is for privacy, don't worry, it's all front end code and your location isn't sent to the server. (You can check the network tab or just look at the code.)

[mmcclure]

Yes, it was extremely clear that your position is that it’s overfunded.

    OK, so we agree SFUSD is not underfunded?

No, we don’t, I just wasn’t trying to make that point. There’s absolutely debates to be had about SFUSD, including how they spend their budget (personally I would make big cuts at the central office and redistribute to the schools), but the thought that $28k/kid is too much in SF just isn’t grounded in reality.

    two thirds of students are behind grade level in math, and there's no opportunity to be grouped with kids in other grades.

This type of broad statement is true, but also obscures the realities of the student population SFUSD is mandated to serve. That high level number includes special education, non-English speakers, etc. Generally speaking, the data for kids with a similar socioeconomic background to the one I suspect your kids have are doing fine in SFUSD, particularly in K-8.

For example, a low key popular school with “bad scores,” Flynn[1]. ~30% of the student population met or exceeded the standard for math. That number jumps to 65.4% for kids with college-educated parents, and 81.3% for grad school. Race is an unfortunate proxy here, but it’s 70.8% for white students.

Not trying to convince you to send your kid to public school, of course, just calling out that there’s nuance required when comparing outcomes and what can work for families.

[1] https://caaspp-elpac.ets.org/caaspp/DashViewReportSB?ps=true...