[fhap]

> The article has some valid points but is full of ragebait exaggeration.

Given that Rust doesn’t always have critiques that are backed with evidence, this wasn’t bad.

People can use C now that LLMs make it easier, so Rust is no longer needed in many ways.

[merb]

You are joking, right? Writing c with llm‘s… what can go wrong?!

[ameixaseca]

> Given that Rust doesn’t always have critiques that are backed with evidence, this wasn’t bad.

What evidence?