top | item 46041199

(no title)

hnav | 3 months ago

conversely, running a firewall on something like ZFS also sounds like too much. Ideally I'd want a read-only root FS with maybe an /etc and /var managed by an overlay.

discuss

order

lmm|3 months ago

Sounds like overcomplicating in the name of simplification. ZFS is a good, reliable, general-purpose system; often the right answer is to just put everything on ZFS and get on with your life.

SoftTalker|3 months ago

I’ve had more problems with zfs than all other filesystems combined including FAT. It’s IMO overkill for a root partition.

znpy|3 months ago

> conversely, running a firewall on something like ZFS also sounds like too much.

this makes no sense. firewalling does not touch the filesystem very much if at all.

what FS is being used is essentially orthogonal to firewalling performances.

if anything, having a copy-on-write filesystem like ZFS on your firewall/router means you have better integrity in case of configuration mistakes and OS upgrade (just rollback the dataset to the previous snapshot!)

hnav|3 months ago

my point was that if a hardware vendor were to approach this problem, they'd probably have 2 (prev,next) partitions that they write firmware to, plus separate mounts for config and logs, rather than a kitchen-sink CoW FS