top | item 46044193 (no title) windward | 3 months ago BSD is given as an example of the cathedral in the book. discuss order hn newest signa11|3 months ago indeed, iirc, the 1998 usenix presentation by mckusick et al, seems to be an earlier record of (than the book) these s/w development models.fwiw, both the gnu project and freebsd champion this (cathedral style of) development model.however, i don't think linux or bsd is *purely* either approach.w.r.t `user-facing software` which seems to be central thesis of gp, both the alternates (bsd/linux) offer almost an identical choice.
signa11|3 months ago indeed, iirc, the 1998 usenix presentation by mckusick et al, seems to be an earlier record of (than the book) these s/w development models.fwiw, both the gnu project and freebsd champion this (cathedral style of) development model.however, i don't think linux or bsd is *purely* either approach.w.r.t `user-facing software` which seems to be central thesis of gp, both the alternates (bsd/linux) offer almost an identical choice.
signa11|3 months ago
fwiw, both the gnu project and freebsd champion this (cathedral style of) development model.
however, i don't think linux or bsd is *purely* either approach.
w.r.t `user-facing software` which seems to be central thesis of gp, both the alternates (bsd/linux) offer almost an identical choice.