top | item 46047662

(no title)

fidelity2482 | 3 months ago

[flagged]

discuss

order

crazygringo|3 months ago

Why would you even bother to post such a shallow dismissal like this, without engaging with the article at all? What are you hoping to achieve?

fidelity2482|3 months ago

There is nothing to engage with. I think tersely. Some researchers could learn.

I find it annoying that a large part of research is the obsession of taking a perfectly smooth, gradual phenomenon and introducing artificial boundaries, sometimes even with formal labels. And then we spend the next few decades rolling it back as we inevitably find out that reality is nuanced, and the arbitrary categorization is more of a distraction than a meaningful tool. But I'm sure this fantastical finding was great for somebody's career.

speedylight|3 months ago

Except the five eras in the article are based scientific observations of how the brain changes overtime where’s yours are based on having a snide attitude.