there are infinite buddha worlds in even a raindrop. No kidding. These are very old ideas.
Just read translations of the old Zen masters. Or better yet, translations of translations. The translators will reveal that sometimes small errors with each iteration are sometimes beneficial. But I digress.
Circular Argument - by defining consciousness as a universal field (with zero evidence), the outcome of individual consciousness as an illusion is preordained.
pygy_|3 months ago
The author has a strong quantum physics background, and makes testable predictions [1].
This isn't circular fluff as argued in this thread, but a mathematically fledged theoretical framework.
1. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article/15/11/115319/3372193/Un...
DaveZale|3 months ago
Just read translations of the old Zen masters. Or better yet, translations of translations. The translators will reveal that sometimes small errors with each iteration are sometimes beneficial. But I digress.
stevenalowe|3 months ago
theoa|3 months ago
https://gemini.google.com/share/1a6663a83898
Schrodinger and Penrose: pro. Einstein: con.
My favorite part is the debate between His Holiness the Dalai Lama and President Donald Trump on Maria Strømme's interesting effort.