[stanleykm]

There aren’t any content warnings for links on HN. So it’s not like the user is making a conscious choice to go to a furry personal blog.

[krapp]

There is nothing in the linked article that would require a content warning. No sexually explicit or even implicit content whatsoever.

[alephnerd]

Furry content is often deemed NSFW, and it can get annoying for it to be constantly flashed in your face.

Nothing wrong with it, but giving some sort of content warning isn't the worst thing in the world.

Personally, it does get annoying sometimes when two completely unrelated topics are fused into one - personally I'd find this kind of content equally as annoying as that cringe Gen X "Semiconductors with Brittany Spears" shtick, but to each their own.

There is nothing wrong with content flags or warnings, especially for stuff with a sensual or potentially sexual connotation.