The interviews with the foreman following the case were pretty damning—it sounded like he barely listened to the judge's instructions and essentially goaded the jury into returning a verdict which expressed his personal feelings about patents more than it reflected anything about Apple vs. Samsung.
I suppose the question, though, is whether he actually did anything that's provably "misconduct"...
He explicitly did not disclose during juror interview about his being previously sued by Seagate, where Samsung was the majority shareholder, and which is likely what resulted in his bankruptcy filing. One might find a prejudice in such an event, especially if it was not disclosed.
[+] [-] snogglethorpe|13 years ago|reply
I suppose the question, though, is whether he actually did anything that's provably "misconduct"...
[+] [-] thrill|13 years ago|reply