top | item 46061896

(no title)

thornewolf | 3 months ago

This comment is likely AI. Consider author post history as well.

(this comment)

> This idea sits in a really interesting space because on paper

(previous comments)

> I really like this class of work because it sits at a strange intersection:

> It’s wild how Voyager forces two truths to sit together:

The pattern is "<compliment intellectual stimulation> <make note of juxtaposition>"

> becomes workflow-aware, not just price-aware.

> human mental model instead of the mathematically convenient one.

> run for that mindset more than for the tech.

My meta comment is not breaking the HN guidelines by letter, but may be spiritually breaking guidelines. See:

> Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like.

I think clarification on AI-accusations should be added to the guidelines if it falls under this class of comment.

discuss

order

Analemma_|3 months ago

The post itself is AI too, so we've got a perfect closed circle. Soon HN won't even need the humans anymore, as long as it drives enough hype and seed round funding.

growt|3 months ago

Interesting, I read the comment and it had some very valid points and didn’t veer off into AI brabble. If it is AI I’d like to see the prompt!