top | item 46065882

(no title)

aikinai | 3 months ago

The article strongly misrepresents this, and they were almost certainly not detained for over-staying, but likely for fraudulent entry. See my other comment.

discuss

order

monocasa|3 months ago

I don't think fraudulent entry makes sense, because that would have to be the case at the time of entry.

aikinai|3 months ago

Read my other comment. It’s fraudulent based on intent, which they don’t know until you apply for change of status.

LorenPechtel|3 months ago

Except there has been no determination of a fraudulent entry. This is skipping directly from accusation to punishment.

And it is definitely possible to have entered without an intent to marry. The day the woman I married entered the US she did not know of my existence. We met here.

aikinai|3 months ago

In many cases regarding immigration, any single agent can act as judge, jury, and (deportation) executioner. Again something I learned many years ago and have kept top of mind for my own family.

If you are already married, then you enter the country with an assertion that you have no intent to immigrate, then you soon after apply to immigrate, chances you were not lying are vanishingly slim.

Yes, if you meet after you enter the country, then that doesn't apply to you. That's exactly when it is appropriate to apply from inside the country and stay while your application is pending. That's not what these couples are doing.