top | item 46066457

(no title)

mzhaase | 3 months ago

I would like to point people to the Odroid H4 series of boards. N97 or N355, 2*2.5GbE, 4*SATA, 2 W in idle. Also has extension boards to turn it into a router for example.

The developer hardkernel also publishes all relevant info such as board schematics.

discuss

order

antonkochubey|3 months ago

And the best feature is they have in-band ECC, which can correct one-bit and detect two-bit errors. No other Alder Lake-N or Twin Lake SBC exposes this feature in UEFI.

ceving|3 months ago

Can you give a reference for ECC? I can not find anything about ECC support on the Odroid site.

adrian_b|3 months ago

There is the ASUS NUC 13 Rugged, which also exposes the in-band ECC, but it is both much more expensive and much slower (it uses either a 2-core or a 4-core Atom CPU, while ODROID uses either a 4-core or an 8-core CPU of the same Gracemont-based series).

kajika91|3 months ago

I also have an older Odroid HC4, it's been years it is running smoothly and not only I cannot use 1000$ for a NAS as the current post implied but the power consumption seems crazy to me for a mere disk-over-network usage (using a 500W power supply).

I like the extensive benchmark from hardkernel, the only issue is that any ARM-based product is very tricky to boot and the only savior is armbian.

Aurornis|3 months ago

> the power consumption seems crazy to me for a mere disk-over-network usage (using a 500W power supply).

The rated power supply spec is the maximum it can provide, not the actual consumption of the device.

andruby|3 months ago

I've had an H3 for a few years and it runs amazing. Very low power usage, small footprint and great stability. I run it with an M.2 ssd for power considerations.

Before that I had a full size NAS with an efficient Fujitsi motherboard, pico-psu, 12V adaptor and spinning HDD's. That required so much extra work for so little power efficiency gains vs the Odroid.