top | item 46078417

(no title)

EdwardCoffin | 3 months ago

Even if that's the intended meaning of literally, it is still a reckless exaggeration. I'm pretty sure that Stephenson's endings are no more abrupt than some of Shakespeare's (check out Hamlet and Macbeth) or some of Frank Herbert's (see Dune and Children of Dune), and I never hear anyone go out of their way to describe either of them as being unable to write endings.

discuss

order

hnmullany|3 months ago

Everything from Stephenson after Anathem is an unremitting slog. He needs an editor who won't back down from telling him he needs to cut a third of his pages.

jeremyjh|3 months ago

Reamde and Fall are quite readable. But what does this have to do with endings?

disgruntledphd2|3 months ago

> some of Frank Herbert's (see Dune and Children of Dune),

I mean, Dune does in fact end mid-story, which is probably worse.

jeremyjh|3 months ago

No, no it doesn't. Are you talking about the recent movies that split the first novel into two movies? The novel Dune ends after Paul defeats his enemies and becomes emperor.