[superconduct123]

Totally agree, I've found that as well working in big tech

People focus way to much on the superficial stuff like code cleanliness, formatting, organization, local structure of the code

Because that stuff is easy to talk about, kind of like bikeshedding.

Plus a lot of times code reviewers just want to comment something to show they aren't just rubber stamping it.

Whereas it takes a lot more brain power to think about logic, correctness, and "does the change actually make sense in the big picture"

Part of it too is that as a reviewer a lot of times you just don't have enough context to know if the change makes sense

[AppleBananaPie]

In the context of reviews my experience has only been code review quality brought up as a negative thing for folks and the bar to not be a negative is low enough that folks slowly take less and less time to review code well because it isn't valued come review time.

[tayo42]

>does the change actually make sense in the big picture"

Ideally by the time your at code review this is not a question. It sucks for everyone for it to come up.

I think people also avoid rejecting for this reason becasue of that