top | item 46085953 (no title) SG- | 3 months ago well they were using Unreal engine before and it was much slower as indicated. they managed to get what they wanted at 8k/60fps which was also their goal so three.js was right for them? discuss order hn newest samdoesnothing|3 months ago I'm not saying it was the wrong choice in hindsight but Three.js is not particularly fast either so I'm surprised they managed to get 8k/60 out of it.
samdoesnothing|3 months ago I'm not saying it was the wrong choice in hindsight but Three.js is not particularly fast either so I'm surprised they managed to get 8k/60 out of it.
samdoesnothing|3 months ago