[state_less]

Chatgpt is a proprietary eponym[1], like kleenex, or Google for search. That's a relatively strong attractor based on their first mover status. I nevertheless use tissues, and search engines like brave search, sometimes duckduckgo, and claude or openrouter for my LLM models.

I think there are too many good alternatives for Chatgpt to turn the screws too hard on their users, but we'll see where it settles out. As usual, the most vulnerable will be squeezed the hardest (the ignorant and tech feeble). Hopefully competition and some oversight will keep the wolves at bay.

The finance people were chatting about the OpenAI's ad play a while back, glad to see it finally dawning on this crowd.

1. Not all jurisdictions have granted OpenAI the Chatgpt trademark.

[cameronh90]

I think I hear as many people calling it ChatGBT or ChatGTP as ChatGPT.

[state_less]

"Oh no it's GPT, a Generative Pretrained Transformer shaped into chat responses."

[DANmode]

None of which, when searched, will lead the user to Claude, Qwen, et al.

Just OpenAI and ChatGPT.

So what’s your point?

[FarmerPotato]

Chachapita