top | item 46088512

(no title)

Amekedl | 3 months ago

Care to elaborate regarding tauri? I figured it has matured into a fine electron alternative.

discuss

order

d3Xt3r|3 months ago

Not OP, but I recall Tauri greatly overstating their memory usage claims. It is ultimately a browser running your "app", but just because it's not bundled with your app, doesn't make it consume any lesser RAM. And they even admitted that their benchmarks were wrong[1].

A lot of claims were also made about how Tauri is magically more performant than Electron apps and feels like a native app, but not only is this not true, on some platforms like Linux, Tauri apps are actually slower than Electron because the system webview it uses (generally WebKitGTK) is often slower and less optimised than the Chromium build that Electron ships with[2].

There's a bunch more claims due to it being "Rust" and all the memes that comes with that territory, but all that is basically irrelevant since your "app" is basically shitty javascript in the end. It's like putting lipstick and dressing up a pig, doesn't change the fact that it's still a pig.

[1] https://github.com/orgs/tauri-apps/discussions/3162

[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/tauri/comments/1kg5zb8/will_tauri_f...

venturecruelty|3 months ago

I can't believe people will still put in all of this work instead of just... using their system's native GUI. Mind-boggling.

mentalgear|3 months ago

Mostly Tauri claimed their main advantage was smaller app sizes since it's using the native WebView. What they didn't say is how a bottomless pit it is to try standardizing rendering on X different webviews, multiplied by X different webview versions (outdated, not updated systems) ; so now they have pivoted to shipping their own build-in browser ; Competition in open-space is okay but it shouldn't be made by only pushing its perceived advantages while withholding the systemic disadvantages.